Vladislav Rapetsky wrote on Tue, Jan 17, 2012 06:33 PM UTC:
Unfortunately found a bug. I have a problem - I do not know English!
>>> If a player inadveringly takes a protected piece with his king, he
loses the game.
- No, no, no! We speak the language of Zillions?
Goal of the game author:
(loss-condition (White Black) (checkmated King))
(loss-condition (White Black) (captured Rook))
(loss-condition (White Black) (captured Knight))
(loss-condition (White Black) (captured Elephant))
You can in this way:
(loss-condition (White Black) (checkmated King))
(loss-condition (White Black) (pieces-remaining 7))
Zillions is weak! I was very upset.
***
Goal of the game implemented in Chess_without_Pawns.zrf:
(loss-condition (White Black) (checkmated King))
The best can!
In an embodiment, when the Zillions against Zillions:
(loss-condition (White Black) (checkmated King))
(loss-condition (White Black) repetition)
This helps to avoid repetition!
***
If you like Chess_without_Pawns.zrf propose to publish it in the pages
chessvariants.com
A Zillions implementation can be downloaded here:
http://hem.passagen.se/melki9/Chess_without_Pawns.zip
implemented by Mats Winther, invented by Vladislav Rapetsky