Thank you H.G. for the explanations. Of course, I knew that poor/good/excellent choice which is available when posting a comment; but I thought it was a way to transmit some reaction in addition to the comment. I couldn't imagine it was meant as a judgement or a note for a game. For instance a game can be very good, I might find a detail on the page that I dislike (e.g. (I'm joking) using Aanca for Manticore) and then I could post a comment with "poor". It doesn't mean I consider that game is poor! Just a reaction related to my comment.
I think this rating shouldn't be taken a rating of the game itself.
Also, like you, I don't see the correspondance between poor/good/excellent with a 5 star system.
I hope this will be clarified. If it is confirmed, I will have to return on every variant I have favoured (not mine) to place a rating. I can do it, although this is a bit childish too.
Thank you H.G. for the explanations. Of course, I knew that poor/good/excellent choice which is available when posting a comment; but I thought it was a way to transmit some reaction in addition to the comment. I couldn't imagine it was meant as a judgement or a note for a game. For instance a game can be very good, I might find a detail on the page that I dislike (e.g. (I'm joking) using Aanca for Manticore) and then I could post a comment with "poor". It doesn't mean I consider that game is poor! Just a reaction related to my comment.
I think this rating shouldn't be taken a rating of the game itself.
Also, like you, I don't see the correspondance between poor/good/excellent with a 5 star system.
I hope this will be clarified. If it is confirmed, I will have to return on every variant I have favoured (not mine) to place a rating. I can do it, although this is a bit childish too.