Enter Your Reply The Comment You're Replying To Roberto Lavieri wrote on Fri, Jul 29, 2005 10:13 PM UTC:Are Chess players smarter than other people?. Estimated or measured IQ should be an indicative, but it is not precise. I have seen many 'lists' of smart people, and in many of them are included the names of Bobby Fisher (IQ 187) and Judith Polgar (175), but there are variations. Many lists are leadered by Marilyn vos Savant (228), Leonardo da Vinci (220), J.Wolfgang van Goethe (210), but these estimated or suposed score measures are not confident (astronomically improbable!), according to statistical considerations, and it is extremely probable that they are over-estimations. Once Kasparov took a test, and his score was 135, I think it is not a good indicative, and it can be an under-measure of the reality, as the 91 IQ assigned to G.W.Bush, obviously another under-estimation that looks ridiculous. But, independently on the precision, there are scientific studies that conclude a notorious fact: measured IQ increases in people who learn Chess, and the more time dedicated to Chess, higher is the increment. Is it possible that the Chess (and variants, why not?)practice has influence on the intelligence increase?. It seems it is true, according to some serious studies, but it is the need of a comparative measure between Chess people and others, for a clear conclusion. Edit Form You may not post a new comment, because ItemID Smarter? does not match any item.