George Duke wrote on Thu, Aug 7, 2008 06:44 PM EDT:
This was interesting series. R>F 356-320 F>R 676 is subdivided into R>F
120-93 F>R 213 followed by R>F 236-227 F>R 463, the latter being less
than 51% to over 49%. How would I value Falcon now in light of Muller's
findings, that Falcon + King mates as it does and the above statistics.
Initially Falcon > Rook until some number of pieces have been captured.
Certainly by 20 pieces on board Rook > Falcon. The valuations at different
stages of play by criterion of how many Pawns and pieces remain are in
flux, as more scores get studied. Falcon of course is never in general so much as 6.0
to Rook 5, nor so low as 4 to Rook 5. As my inquiry seeks clarification, I guess it is same style of viewing in this series so of course please leave it in.